Tracking what you eat can feel like an extra chore, but if you're trying to make changes to your diet—whether it's for fat loss, muscle gain, or just to feel better—having some way to track your intake can be a game-changer. The trick? Finding a method that works for you—one you can stick with consistently.
The good news is, there’s no one right way to do it. Whether you prefer writing things down, snapping food pics, using hand portions, or weighing every gram, the key is consistency. And while no method is 100% perfect, tracking something is always better than flying blind.
Let’s break down some of the most common food tracking methods, what the research says about their accuracy, and how to choose the best one for your lifestyle.
Why Track Your Food in the First Place?
You might think, I know what I eat, why bother tracking it? Well, research shows that most of us actually don’t know how much we eat.
Studies suggest that people underestimate their calorie intake by 30 to 50%—which is a huge gap if you’re trying to make progress. (1)
A classic example? Peanut butter. You might think you’re eating one tablespoon, but if you're eyeballing it, it’s easy to end up with two (or more). That’s an extra 100+ calories you weren’t accounting for. Do that a few times a day, and your “healthy meal plan” might not be as dialed in as you thought.
That’s where tracking comes in—it gives you data. It helps you see patterns, understand portion sizes, and make small tweaks that actually move the needle.
Different Ways to Track Your Food
1. Food Diaries (Pen & Paper or Apps)
A traditional food journal means writing down everything you eat, along with portion sizes and sometimes calories/macros. This can be done in a notebook, an app like MyFitnessPal, or even a spreadsheet if you’re feeling extra organized.
✅ Pros:
Fairly accurate if done consistently
Helps identify eating patterns and emotional triggers
Great for mindful eating and accountability
❌ Cons:
Can feel tedious over time
Requires estimating portion sizes (which can lead to errors)
Might not work for those who don’t enjoy writing or logging food
2. Food Photography
This method involves taking pictures of everything you eat, either for personal reflection, to share with a coach, or to use with a food-tracking app that analyzes calories and macros.
✅ Pros:
Quick and easy—just snap a photo!
Can be a helpful visual reminder of what you ate throughout the day
Works well for those who dislike logging detailed data
❌ Cons:
Not as accurate as written tracking (photo-based calorie estimations are often off)
Hard to gauge hidden calories (like oils, dressings, and sauces)
Doesn’t provide macro breakdowns unless analyzed by software
3. Hand Portion Method
This method estimates portion sizes based on your hand:
Protein: The size of your palm
Vegetables: The size of your fist
Carbs: A cupped hand
Fats: The size of your thumb
✅ Pros:
No weighing, measuring, or logging needed
Simple and sustainable for long-term use
Fairly accurate (research suggests up to 95% accuracy compared to precise measurements)
❌ Cons:
Less detailed—doesn’t track specific calories or macros
May require adjustments for highly individualized goals (like bodybuilding or medical needs)
4. Weighing & Measuring Food
For those who want the most precise tracking, weighing food on a kitchen scale and logging it in an app is the gold standard.
✅ Pros:
Most accurate method available
Helps with portion control and breaking down macros
Ideal for those with specific body composition goals
❌ Cons:
Time-consuming and not always practical
Can lead to obsession over numbers
Not sustainable for everyone long-term
What Does the Research Say?
A recent study compared food diaries (FD) and food photography (FP) to see which was more accurate. (2)
Findings:
Both methods underestimated calories, but food diaries were slightly more accurate.
Food diaries underestimated calorie intake by about 13%, while photo tracking was off by 18%.
Hand portion tracking wasn’t tested in this study, but previous research suggests it can be very close to weighing food.
Key Takeaways:
📌 No method is perfect, but some are better than others. Food diaries are a little more accurate than food photos, but all methods have some level of error.
📌 What matters most is consistency. If you track consistently—even if it’s not 100% precise—you’ll get valuable data to make adjustments.
📌 Choose a method that fits your lifestyle. The best tracking method is the one you can stick with long-term.
How to Pick the Best Method for You
The best tracking method isn’t about what’s most scientific—it’s about what fits your routine. Ask yourself:
1️⃣ How much detail do I need? If you want precision, weighing/measuring or a food diary might be best. If you just want general awareness, photos or hand portions might work better.
2️⃣ What’s realistic for my lifestyle? If you travel a lot or eat out frequently, food photos or hand portions might be more practical than weighing everything.
3️⃣ What will I actually stick with? The best method is the one you’ll do consistently. If tracking in an app feels overwhelming, a simple notebook might be a better fit.
Final Thoughts: Track What Works for YOU
No matter which method you choose, consistency is key. Even the most accurate method won’t help if you only do it for a week and then stop.
Instead of chasing perfection, aim for progress. The goal is to increase awareness, make better choices, and adjust as needed.
Want to take the next step? Try tracking for just one week using the method that feels easiest for you. You might be surprised at what you learn!
References
Lichtman, S. W., et al. "Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects." New England Journal of Medicine, 1992.
Comments